<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Protocol for Offering and Asking for Favors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.yootles.com/2006/11/04/new-protocol-for-offering-and-asking-for-favors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.yootles.com/2006/11/04/new-protocol-for-offering-and-asking-for-favors/</link>
	<description>A weblog by Daniel Reeves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 06:29:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dreeves</title>
		<link>http://blog.yootles.com/2006/11/04/new-protocol-for-offering-and-asking-for-favors/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>dreeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yootles.com/?p=6#comment-3</guid>
		<description>That one was very similar in spirit.  Instead of &quot;I can take your cat to the vet since you have homework due&quot; it was &quot;I&#039;ll share the job of taking the cat to the vet.&quot;  We then had a Decision Auction to decide who would actually do it.  I lost, meaning I had to take the cat, but got paid yootles for it.

The beauty of this protocol is that, sure, it&#039;s nice of me to want to help when Bethany&#039;s cat gets sick right before a deadline, but I shouldn&#039;t presume to know how busy she is.  Let the &quot;invisible hand&quot; decide who truly minds least.  And as a bonus, it compensates the person who gets stuck with the job, giving them capital to use next time they need a favor in return.

This is exactly what people try to approximate by trying to alternate favors and feeling each other out.  The reason to use yootles instead is simple:  it does a better job.  That translates quite literally into greater happiness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That one was very similar in spirit.  Instead of &#8220;I can take your cat to the vet since you have homework due&#8221; it was &#8220;I&#8217;ll share the job of taking the cat to the vet.&#8221;  We then had a Decision Auction to decide who would actually do it.  I lost, meaning I had to take the cat, but got paid yootles for it.</p>
<p>The beauty of this protocol is that, sure, it&#8217;s nice of me to want to help when Bethany&#8217;s cat gets sick right before a deadline, but I shouldn&#8217;t presume to know how busy she is.  Let the &#8220;invisible hand&#8221; decide who truly minds least.  And as a bonus, it compensates the person who gets stuck with the job, giving them capital to use next time they need a favor in return.</p>
<p>This is exactly what people try to approximate by trying to alternate favors and feeling each other out.  The reason to use yootles instead is simple:  it does a better job.  That translates quite literally into greater happiness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bee</title>
		<link>http://blog.yootles.com/2006/11/04/new-protocol-for-offering-and-asking-for-favors/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yootles.com/?p=6#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I think that the auction for taking the cat to the vet is a little bit clearer exposition of this favor system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the auction for taking the cat to the vet is a little bit clearer exposition of this favor system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

